Do you think mass space tourism will awaken a global eco-consciousness?
Q. Space tourism will soon begin in earnest, with suborbital flights. Initially, these short trips will cost a lot of money and be for the happy few. But within a few years, - hopefully -, space tourism might be accessible to very many middle class people. When astronauts return from orbit, they often describe the beauty and fragility of our planet. They respect earth, its ecosystems and all living creatures on it. They understand how careful we must be with what we do to this tiny dot in the universe. Will space tourism generate such an ecological view on life on Earth? Will suborbital flights leave the same impression on the tourists? And will they, consequently, spread the message of the care we must take to protect the fragile life and… [cont.]
Asked by Euronesiangirl - Mon Nov 24 01:41:17 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments

A. As long as we have chemical rockets and propulsion, the amount of pollutants produced to get into orbit would make ecological-minded space tourists kind of hypocritical.
Answered by AntiApollyon - Mon Nov 24 02:30:33 2008

Are flat earthers SO dogmatic that....?
Q. In a few years, once space tourism becomes more accessible to the masses that people can purchase orbital flights, would a flat earther even dare go on such a flight? If so, seeing the round Earth for themselves, would they finally STFU??? They should call it the "head in the sand society"
Asked by ZeroByte - Fri Dec 14 13:16:12 2007 - - 7 Answers - 0 Comments

A. You've been checkin out ole' john slayer's questions. Yea man, I hope they do once space tourism is available. Speaking of, I hope that's gonna be relatively inexpensive. Seeing the earth would be... ... . . a word I can't even think of to be better than the best word to describe this.
Answered by Jansen J - Fri Dec 14 13:30:00 2007

nature question?
Q. most people take pride in the natural beauty of wildlife. can you think of 2 or more reasons why tourists, tourism, and technology can cause problem for nature-abundant areas such as the Grand Canyon, or wildlife preservation parks? should natural habitats like these be left alone and only accessible to native american tribes(whose home the land usually is) instead of becoming tourist attractions? ---i read this question in a nature book, and i was wondered how most people feel about this issue. i'd like to know your thoughts and comments on this topic. thanks!
Asked by Delilah - Mon Feb 25 18:54:03 2008 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Not sure why a lot of people think it is politically correct to give land back to the Indians...who only took it from other tribes when they defeated the weaker one. Are you going to ask those Indians to give that land back to the first tribe that settled the land. I think not. The same applies to special grants or money for the families of slaves from Africa. Where do you think the white man learned about getting these slaves??? Could have been during one of their trading sessions...when one tribe raided the other...they took members of that tribe to do their hard work...in other words...slaves. The Africans started all this slave trading...even back in the days of Egypt...which is on North Africa. So let's stop all this crying on who… [cont.]
Answered by extex_cop - Mon Feb 25 19:09:42 2008

Key facts about Barbados...?
Q. key facts that some people may want to know about Barbados... key facts the United Nations Development Index (1996) ranked Barbados third in terms of quality of life among 160 developing countries worldwide (Hong Kong and Cyprus ranked first and second respectively). Barbados ranked ahead of countries such as Spain, Italy and Ireland. Our research and surveys show that visitors highlight the friendliness of Barbadians as its greatest and most pleasing asset. This is reflected in the highest repeat visitor factor in the region of 39% The people of Barbados have a history of long ingrained Christian principles, a sound and free educational system with a literacy rate of 97% Barbados has the third oldest parliament in the world with 358… [cont.]
Asked by Th@t Ch!ck - Sun Jan 4 04:33:21 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments

A. You seem to have lots of information about Barbados. All what you have written is true. Barbados is a beautiful country with lots to see.
Answered by Highly Favoured - Sun Jan 4 15:12:31 2009

American Samoa, Hawaii, or Micronesia (Guam/Mariana Islands). Where should I move to?
Q. I was considering the USVI but it's too easily accessible. I'm trying to get away from the mainland. Here's what I'm looking for: - Ability to work in the tourism industry (have a hospitality background) - Nice beaches like St. John for example. - Somewhat american food. Just an FYI for those who aren't aware. a) As a US citizen, I can live and work in these areas. b) The primary language in most of these areas is English with a secondary trailing behind. So please no uninformed flac. Just looking for suggestions. Thanks. you raise a great point.. but remember that high unemployment is usually attributed to lack of skill in these areas.
Asked by cgs - Fri Aug 28 19:09:19 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Remember all these places have high unemployment, and locals may resent outsiders taking much needed jobs. I'd move to Hawaii tomorrow if I could. It's amazing.
Answered by concerned neighbor - Fri Aug 28 19:13:30 2009

From Yahoo Answer Search: 'Accessible tourism'
Fri Jul 30 08:24:10 2010 [ refresh local cache ]

Kashmir fears forests will disappear through 'timber smuggling' - The Guardian
guardian.co.uk
Kashmir fears forests will disappear through 'timber smuggling' - The Guardian
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:10:39 GMT+00:00
The Guardian "There is a major problem of political complicity," said Naeem Akhtar, until recently a senior bureaucrat in the Jammu and Kashmir ministry of tourism . ...
Google News Search: Accessible tourism,
Tue Jul 27 03:12:29 2010